Museum
Frictions: Public Cultures/Global Transformations
by Ivan Karp, Corrine
Kratz, Lynn Szwaja and Tomas Ybarra-Frausto,
Editors
Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 2006
632 pp., illus. 70 b/w. Trade, $99.95
Paper, $27.95
ISBN: 0-8223-3878-5; ISBN: 0-8223-3894-7.
Reviewed by Jonathan Zilberg
jonathanzilberg@gmail.com
Museum Frictions sets the agenda
for the conjuncture of critical theory
and practice in the museum world and arts
and heritage industries as they continue
to grapple with the effects of globalization.
The last in a trilogy on museum anthropology,
the first being Exhibiting Cultures
(1991) and the second being Museums
and Communities (1992), the series
constitutes the tangible heritage of the
Rockefeller Foundations and the Smithsonian
Institutions investments in funding, inspiring
and assisting museum programs, exhibitions
and scholarly research. If the first two
volumes provided the proverbial intellectual
wheels for critical museum studies in
the nineties, this volume provides the
connecting chain to combine and advance
all this knowledge so as to produce the
conceptual power to sustain such intellectual
energy in museums and the heritage industry
for years to come.
Inadvertently perhaps, Museum Frictions
represents a productive conjunction
of anthropological interests in the politics
of cultural representation with philosophical
issues previously more central to Cultural
Studies, specifically in terms of the
shared interest in Jurgen Habermas
notion of the public sphere. Working within
this legacy it is an exceptional example
of inter-disciplinary fertilization in
which anthropologists have responded to
Tony Bennets groundbreaking contribution
The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory,
Politics (1995) which advanced his
earlier work "The Exhibitionary Complex"
published in New Formations in
1988. No less significant is the opportunity
that this engagement has provided for
Bennet himself to advance his notions
of the museum as a differencing machine
and to develop a more qualified notion
of the public sphere in order to more
effectively engage the particularities
of globalization. The total effect is
a wonderfully energized set of emerging
theoretical discourses and practices in
tactical museologies and museum reconfigurations
in which activist-scholars are applying
and debating critical theory in the service
of creativity and cultural production.
Herein, the institution, activities, politics
and even pre-colonial histories of museums
become as much sites of observation, critique
and action as do the nature of the exhibits
themselves.
The study presents a diverse field pointing
to the ever- expanding conceptualization
of what constitutes a museum and its aims
and content. These include conflicts,
tensions and anxieties within tangible
and intangible heritage industries including
community museums, slavery and holocaust
museums as commemorative contexts for
expressing grief, national parks as spaces
of death, colonization and opportunity,
Disney-ification and the neo-liberal Bilbao-effect
and much else. Despite this profusion
of materials, a singularly powerful thread
is woven intermittently through the text,
namely the conceptual work performed on
Bennets notion of the exhibitionary
complex in developing the related notions
of experiential and the expositionary
complexes as deftly considered by Barbara
Kirshenblatt Gimblett. Extending
this, and almost by way of epilogue, Fred
Myers, combines Bourdieu and Bennet proposes
an "exhibitionary field of cultural
production" and explores revelatory
Aboriginal regimes of value and the way
in which academic seminars complementing
exhibitions highlight the dislocations
that exist between the various participants.
This adds tension to Howard Morphys
prior questioning of the very notion of
the exhibitionary complex in which he
proposes that exhibitions might more accurately
be understood in terms of complex motivations
and negotiated and highly motivated outcomes
used by individuals, institutions and
communities in order to achieve their
different objectives.
Critique and extension of the Habermasian
notion of the public sphere aside, similarly
fascinating ideas and instances stand
out such as the new term "tactical
museologies", the refusal in cases
to include specimens or originals, the
use of originals to magnify the aura of
the copy and the simulacrum, the use of
auto-critique to limit the inevitable
controversies which result from exhibitions
and even the destruction and removal of
specimens to honor the intent or cultural
logic and mores of the creators. From
all these fascinating instances to the
surprise and wonder in the Lucky Market
in Phnom Penh and the transgressive flexibility
of micro-museum circuitry in Peru, Frictions
provides a radically opened up notion
of what museums are and what such institutions
can achieve particularly in post-conflict
and/or in disenfranchised and aggrieved
communities.
In the spirit of the book, it is important
to highlight at least two theoretical
and philosophical frictions that exist
within the text, firstly between Tony
Bennet and Martin Hall over globalisms
assumed power, and secondly, between the
ancestral figures of Walter Benjamin and
Andre Malraux over the power of the image
versus the "authentic" object.
As I see it, the ideal result of such
intellectual frisson in this volume would
be for activist-scholar-practitioners
currently outside of this privileged community
to generate applicable insights and energy
out of these internal frictions. By transferring
such tensions and knowledge from one context
to another, they could empower themselves
to use museums as democratization and
educational machines and in the embryonic
case advanced below to engage the apposite
visions of Benjamin and Malraux in which
photographic (now digital) imagery can
vastly extend rather than destroy the
power of the aura of the original and
thus the reach of the local.
In Banda Aceh today, there is a smoldering
if largely unknown debate amongst intellectuals
engaged in civil society initiatives over
a proposed Tsunami museum, in which photographic
imagery would presumably constitute much
of the museums collection. Arts
activists in the organization Epicentrum
critique the planned museum as a perverse
diversion of reconstruction funds considering
that the Aceh museum built in 1914 survived
the tsunami completely intact and is poorly
funded and greatly under-used. Simply
put, the frictions addressed and theorized
in this publication remain to be tested
in future applied activist settings such
as these which exist in the extreme periphery
of the international museum community.
And there, especially in such emerging
democratic environments, without the benefit
of reading this book and becoming familiarized
with these tactics and theories, professionals
in museums and those interested in the
museum world will not be able to conceptualize
just how important, how exciting and how
potentially productive the use of museums
in promoting civil society initiatives
is proving to be.