A Culture
of Improvement: Technology and the Western
Millennium
by Robert
Friedel
The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007
576 pp., illus., Trade, $39.95; £24.95
ISBN:10: 0262062623; ISBN:13: 978- 0262062623.
Reviewed by Amy Ione
Director, The Diatrope Institute
Berkeley, CA 94704 USA
ione@diatrope.com
A Culture of Improvement: Technology
and the Western Millennium by Robert
Friedel is an ambitious survey. Beginning
with the eleventh century and surveying
a series of transformative inventions
since that time, the author framed the
study with three goals. First, he is trying
to tell the chronological story of technological
development over the last one thousand
years. Second, the volume is intended
as a proposal for how we should talk about
technological change and technologies.
Third, he is trying to convey that there
is a moral dimension to technology and
to demonstrate that histories of technology
have tended to obscure this aspect of
the issue.
In terms of his efforts to tell a story,
A Culture of Improvement completely
conveys the mastery and inventiveness
of creative minds and as well as the development
of devices that have altered human life
throughout the Western world. Organized
using a theme-based approached (e.g.,
with chapters devoted to topics like power,
textiles, building, transforming matter,
light, printmaking, networking, engineering,
etc), the text conveys Friedels
view that technological change comes about
through a deep-rooted belief that things
can be done in a better way. Whether the
efforts relate to warfare or farming,
evidence is presented to show that technological
innovations are largely conceived through
an incremental process of trial and error
by many minds (despite our tendency to
inscribe individual names to each invention).
Although the book is theme-driven, the
chapter topics do follow a loose chronology.
In this way, Friedel creates a sense of
how life changes from era to era and how
differently we live as compared to those
of the eleventh century, for example.
In other words, each episodic chapter
creates a connection with human activity
and the sum total shows how ongoing developments
have vastly changed the human community
and our relationship with nature. Within
this rubric, the book covers both a broad
sweep without losing sight of incremental
moments. In other words, it is clear that
innovation does not just happen, so much
as contingencies of events come together
in technological development and we later
simplify the context as we outline our
narratives.
Regardless of the technological entity
he is discussing, Friedel is at his best
when setting technological progress within
a context, and doing so in a way that
conveys the creative imaginations of those
who seek out ways to advance our ability
to accomplish various tasks. His talent
for setting the scene and adding flavor
to the story was most evident in areas
where I had more background on the subject
matter (e.g., the development of
railroads and tools for navigation). Reading
sections that introduced aspects of life
I have hardly considered in terms of technology,
I marveled at how much information Friedel
could pack into a paragraph or a page.
Cheesemaking, for example, which came
up in the section on Land and Life, left
me thinking about what a technological
artifact actually is. We all know that
cheesemaking is an ancient activity, long
used to preserve milk products over time.
Prior to the eighteenth century, however,
cheesemaking was primarily a home-based
technology, so the techniques used to
create the various tastes are largely
undocumented. Yet, as is often the case,
when home-based activities moved out of
the house, the intuitive processes used
by homemakers to perfect the various approaches
were formally studied. In this case a
literature began to emerge in the eighteenth
century as factories began to develop
categories and recipes as well as techniques
for controlling bacteria and other micro-organisms.
Similarly, Friedels writing makes
it possible to imagine we are in other
times. For example, when discussing electricity,
the words take the mind into a domain
without light and power so fully that
it is possible to step outside of the
world as we know it.
The historical description is also effective
in demonstrating that innovation does
not tell the whole story of technology.
Equally important, at least in terms of
how advancements settle into our lives,
is the role investment, marketing, and
society play in turning a good (or excellent)
idea into something that human culture
begins to perceive as a necessary component
of life. Josiah Wedgewoods story
offers a case in point. Although his name
is associated with development of earthenware
for the table, his push to develop a product
name had a great deal to do with how marketing
is done today. Indeed, Friedel argues,
Wedgewoods greatest contribution
was his promotion of the idea of consumption
and insight into how to develop marketing
techniques that would promote demand for
the product along with the production
techniques to fulfill it. Seeing the possibilities
of large-scale production of moderately
priced goods combined with good transport
systems, Wedgewood worked wonders with
sales methods that ranged from endorsements
by high-ranking members of society to
newspaper advertisements and ever-changing
styles and fashions. He also understood
that his marketing efforts would pay better
dividends if he kept costs under tight
control. Because he never tired of promotions,
Wedgewood was able to make his goods appear
as necessities despite the availability
of less expensive products of equal quality.
Friedels attempt to convey how we
"should" talk about technology is much
harder to evaluate. Reading through the
text, I was reminded of how art history
survey courses titillate our senses and
yet leave us feeling less than satisfied.
On the one hand, everything goes by so
quickly and, on the other hand, perhaps
invariably, some of an individuals
"favorite works are not discussed
because there simply is not enough time.
Friedel, too, needed to grapple with this
type of smorgasbord. His presentation
contains so much that it seems nothing
could possibly be left out, and yet I
found several topics of great interest
to me received minimal treatment. This
kind of dilemma is endemic with surveys.
A Culture of Improvement, for example,
does convey motivations, patterns, and
the implications of technological change.
Yet, as a member of the art, science,
and technology community, I felt that
the commentary was skewed toward the conventional
history of technology canon, which has
always traditionally downplayed arts
close relationship to science and technology.
Thus, while artmaking techniques are frequently
mentioned (e.g., in relation to
architecture, papermaking and printmaking,
photography, improvements in craft-making,
etc.), I would have made them more predominant
in the discussion. For example, in the
chapter that opens with the bombing of
Guernica, I was disappointed to find no
mention of Picassos powerful Guernica,
often considered his best know work.
Similarly, I would have emphasized alternative
examples in the Improving Knowledge chapter.
Here Friedel correctly notes that both
Nicolas Copernicus De revolutionibus
orbium coelestium (Concerning the
revolutions of the celestial spheres)
and Vesalius De humani corporis
fabrica (Concerning the fabric of
the human body) were published in 1543.
Both books were constructed as direct
challenges to generally accepted and long
taught ways of looking at the work. According
to Friedel, the Copernican challenge is
easier to grasp, and so he goes on to
explain it. Given that the history of
science has traditionally favored seeing
the world through a lens that favors physics
and astronomy, I would have preferred
that he focused on the less familiar story
of how Vesalius contributions provided
a foundation for the modern disciplines
of human and comparative anatomy and physiology,
while also serving as an adjunct to biological
research. Human dissection was forbidden,
even to doctors, until the early Renaissance.
Because Vesalius was among the first who
actually studied the human body through
direct dissections, he was able to join
observational elements with analytic science,
and to do so in a manner that marked a
radical change from earlier times. Furthermore,
although the text of the Fabrica was
not widely read, the illustrations firmly
established that visual methods were essential
for understanding bodily structure. Similarly,
although non-Western contributions to
technological development are mentioned
in passing, I do not think this is adequate
in our global world. Suffice to say, had
it been my book, I would have structured
it in a way that conveyed the need for
academic histories of technology to move
away from the traditional Western bias.
I also would have more fully highlighted
the discussion on the moral dimensions
of technology. Although mentioned in various
chapters, the emphasis on improvement
makes it easy to overlook the questions
raised as technological change alters
human life. It is only in the final chapters,
"The Corruption of Improvement" and "Improvements
End" that the downside of technological
advancement is directly addressed. Even
here, admittedly, I would have mentioned
some details he omitted. For example,
I was sorry to see no reference to The
Pugwash Conferences on Science and World
Affairs. Many individuals who were involved
in developing nuclear weapons regretted
their role. The Pugwash organization was
one outgrowth of this. It has brought
scientists, scholars and public figures
together since 1957 in an effort to work
toward reducing the danger of armed conflict
and to seek solutions to global security
threats.
All in all, I think Friedels approached
the content with the history of science
and technology community in mind, and
thus his direct audience will find the
book well done and on target. My background,
in art, science, and technology has led
me to look for an alternative history.
Clearly, my criticisms here reflect my
desire to see these areas more fully discussed
in the canon. The fact that Friedel and
I favor different details when scanning
the subject, speaks volumes about the
tremendous difficulties we face when trying
to balance the sweep of history with the
need to limit, structure, and organize
our accounts. In this case, Friedel admirably
offers entry into the technological pulse
of Western technology. His readable writing
style will appeal to technological aficionados
and non-specialists alike.
In summary, Robert Friedel, a Professor
in the Department of History at the University
of Maryland, has presented a sweeping
text that will work out well in courses
intended to survey the history of technology,
although I would hope that any instruction
includes a reader with articles that highlight
other cultures. Non-theoretical and engaging,
the study paints with a broad brush but
also presents a grasp of the many small
details that are at play as humans consider
ways to reconfigure how they live. The
impressive outline of the Western record
is enhanced through his artful use of
stories and graphics that bring the reader
into each world. Chapter by chapter, we
can see how the newer technology made
a difference in the lives and aspirations
of those involved. It also serves as a
vehicle to more clearly the role of technology
in all aspects of human living.