|
LDR Category List
|
Global Interests: Renaissance Art between East & West
By Lisa Jardine and Jerry Brotton. The evidence and arguments offered about this co-existence are convincing to the point where it seems inconceivable that serious scholars have previously ignored (or discarded) the apparently rich Eastern connections in some Renaissance source material. And, it is here that the foundational conceit of the book looks most unreliable because one wonders to what extent such connections have been actively 'repressed' (as the authors assume) or simply under-emphasised - a subtle but important distinction. Other than some generalist assumptions about Western European imperialist superiority, the authors offer little hard evidence that the state of affairs they seek to redress actually exists. In effect they claim the influence of the East during the Renaissance has been systematically buried since the nineteenth century only to be "excavated" (p.184) at this late stage. Whilst this may be the case, the cultural history of Europe, at least from the mid-nineteenth century suggests that, in fact, the East has exerted a strong grip over European minds in the fields of art, design, mathematics and metaphysics, to name but a few, and that Eastern artistic objects have been highly-prized and widely assimilated. Therefore, while the book recycles the assumed conflation between 'barbarism', 'exoticism' and 'The East' without presenting it as having a substantial factual base, the impression is created of a general derogation of the East by the West that is not historically accurate. This leaves one feeling that, although 'Global Interests' may offer a refreshing emphasis on East/West interaction in the period and a valuable reassessment of some artistic forms such as tapestry, to claim that it is "groundbreaking" or "highly provocative" (as the book itself does) seems to be over-stated. And while the methodology of analysing visual arts in terms of power relations throws up useful insights it cannot supplant more aesthetic readings without reducing works to dry political fact-sheets. What's more, such 'power-based' analysis can hardly be called 'new' in the light of a long tradition of similar criticism going back through Foucault to Marx. Given the academic provenance of the authors one would have expected a much tighter, more securely grounded case that did not leave non-specialists, like myself, questioning the very basis of the book's thesis. |
Contact LDR: ldr@leonardo.org
Contact Leonardo: isast@leonardo.info
copyright © 2001 ISAST