The Virtual
Window: From Alberti to Microsoft
by Ann Friedber
The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006
448 pp., illus. 113 b/w. Trade, $34.95
ISBN: 0-262-06252-7.
Reviewed by Ian Verstegen
Philadelphia, PA
ianverstegen@yahoo.com
Anne Friedbergs new book is about
the ubiquity of windows in our lives,
from paintings and the camera obscura,
to photography, film, televisions, computers
and iPods: "screens are now everywhere
on our wrists, in our hands, on
our dashboards and in our backseats, on
the bicycles and treadmills at the gym,
on the seats of airplanes and buses, on
buildings and billboards" (p. 87).
We are invaded by multiplying windows,
and this provides an opportunity to reflect
on the understanding of windows, real
and metaphoric, that have informed our
notions of visuality. Although writing
from the institutional locus of film studies
and aware of every nuance of the latest
theories, Friedbergs point of view
refreshingly questions some of the standbys
of postmodern media theory. The hegemonic
model of scopic visuality is broken down,
and objectivity peeks its way through;
the Lacanian mirror is traded for the
plate glass window.
Friedbergs study is especially timely
since she writes at the moment of the
loss of material differences between cinematic,
televisual and computer screens (p. 236).
A historical treatment is called for,
lest this situation in which we find ourselves
where one can watch television, movies,
and compute all on a laptop, become a
new historical teleology. In other words,
the historical specificity of each of
the distinct media must be respected.
This Friedberg does admirably from discussions
of fifteenth century linear perspective
(Alberti), to the seventeenth century
camera obscura, commercial windows
in the nineteenth century and movie houses
of the twentieth.
Friedberg begins, as the title suggests,
with Leon Battista Alberti, the codifier
of linear perspective and an often-invoked
figure in establishing the Western regime
of visuality. Unlike most retrospectively
oriented (and caricatured) discussions
of Alberti, however, Friedbergs
is historically informed, and she notes
the disjunction between Albertis
discussion of the subject of painting
istoria and the putative
windows he would have painters look through.
Turning next to Descartes, whose philosophy
is often seen as the full-fledged rationalization
of trends begun by Alberti, Friedberg
coins the "Cartesian coincidence,"
that is, the "shaky conflation"
(p. 47) between centered perspective and
the Cartesian subject.
If the window is only a metaphor for painting,
Friedberg turns in chapter 2 to the camera
obscura for something that functions
much more like a window, for it projects
real light and movement. Jonathan Crarys
plea for discontinuity between the camera
obscura and photography is amended
by Friedberg, who endorses the gradualistic
ideas of Laurent Mannoni and Deac Rossell.
Moving next to photography, Friedberg
is not surprised that Niépce would
choose a long exposure out of his window,
but the window "did not frame a transparent
plane for seeing through but, rather,
uses its frame to encase a surface, its
virtual substitute" (p. 73).
Chapter 3 begins with a history of glass
production and its improvement through
the ages. Arriving at modern plate glass
and a new visuality: "Its transparency
enforced a two-way model of visuality:
by framing a private view outward
the picture window
and by framing a public view inward
the display window" (p.
113). Contrary to Le Corbusiers
horizontal windows in homes, Sergei Eisenstein
wanted to transform the already rectangular
1:33.1 ratio of the early film to one
more vertical and, frankly, manly and
virile. The virtual window
of film turns opaque walls into virtual
windows, the situation to exist until
the present.
Given this duality of window and screen,
Friedberg in Chapter 4 proposes to give
the same attention to "the architecture
of light of the darkrooms" as given
to Paxtons 1851 Crystal Palace.
What kind of virtual architecture was
created on the screens of the new cinema?
Discussing two paradoxes, Friedberg first
points to that of the materiality
of the theater and the virtuality of the
image, discussing the so-called
"train effect" where early moviegoers
were terrified by oncoming trains. The
second paradox is the mobility of
the image and immobility of
the spectator. Here, instead of
an image approaching the viewer, the panning
camera movements simulate the viewers
movement.
Remarking on the way that televisions
multiple channels and remote control and
next computers numerous on-command windows
have surpassed the fixed, single program
cinematic experience, Friedberg in Chapter
5 notes that the "armchair televisual
viewer is a montagist" and that digital
moving-image is postcinematic (p. 193).
Interestingly, as magic lantern and photographic
projections systems improved, viewers
were content with single images. The newest
paradigm of on-command digital material
deliverable through any number of windows
is the culmination of televisions
interactivity. Friedberg study will
remind us that the early, metaphorical
window has only recently become a genuine
if still virtual window onto experience.