Jean-Paul Fourmentraux
Centre de Sociologie du Travail
et des Arts
Ecole des Hautes Etudes en
Sciences Sociales
105, boulevard Raspail, 75006
Paris
France
Tel : +33.8.73.88.37.88
+33.6.33.71.03.71
Email: jean-
paul.fourmentraux@ehess.fr
Web: http://cesta.ehess.fr/document.php?id=80 |
Jean-Paul Fourmentraux, born
in Fez, Morocco, in 1970, lives and works in Paris (France) and in
Montreal (Canada). Jean-Paul Fourmentraux is a sociologist (PHD) at
the National Center of the Scientific Research (France: CNRS) and in
the School of the High Studies in Social Sciences (Paris: EHESS).
Co-author of two research reports for the Plastic Arts Delegation to
the french Ministry of Culture: Visual Culture and group art on the
web (1999), Between the artist and the computer scientist: a space of
arbitration, translation, negotiation, (2001). Author of various
articles on digital art for the publications Solaris (2000),
Sociology of Art (2002), Archée (2003-04),
Ligeia and Leonardo (2003), Reseaux (2004).
New book:
Art and
Internet. New forms of creation, 2005,
CNRS,
Paris, France. ISBN: 2-271-06353-1
New research:
Innovative Artists
From
artistic research to technological innovation
The
process of technological innovation heralds the reconfiguration of
the organization of research in the media arts. The imperatives of
innovation and creativity have become the driving force for
industry-transferable research and creation. In this context,
“artistic talent” is a highly sought-after resource that
is actively encouraged,. so much so that the identity and roles of
contemporary artists are being transformed: no longer only creators,
they are expected to be researchers and entrepreneurs, experts in the
“new economy.” Although wagering on these new
“workers” may be politically correct, the relationship
between artistic creativity and innovation remains problematic.
At
present, new forms of consortiums are created to foster innovative
“research and creation” that has the potential to
generate spinoffs and added value, not only from an artistic
perspective, but a scientific and industrial one as well. Such
alliances are difficult to establish: first because the
interdisciplinary hybrid known as “research and creation”
lacks a stable identity; second, because the products created are not
distributed under the same conditions or through the same channels as
traditional art or more conventional scientific research; and lastly,
because of the uncertainty surrounding the scope and longevity of
such initiatives. This is linked to the absence of explicit demand
that would enable this segment to perpetuate itself socially, recruit
practitioners, and provide career opportunities, as well as to the
lack of assurances regarding the development and/or commercial
potential of what it produces outside the artistic community. The new
“artistic organizations,” which are supposed to promote
research and creation with social spinoffs, do not easily fit with
the old organizational models in place in academia and industry. As a
result, the economy of “research and creation” requires a
reconfiguration of organizational management in these establishments,
but also a redefinition of the positions, workers, tools, works, and
knowledge to be covered.
Fourmentraux's research combines an analysis of these concepts,
which are at once social utopias and hypotheses on the transformation
of industrial societies, with an empirical examination of this sector
of activity in Europe and Canada (Montreal). The analysis is based on
a survey of entrepreneurs, researchers and artists moving between
arts organizations, institutional research labs and the business
world.
|